<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 352 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419314</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition seeking direction for representation decision on a shop demolition that occurred in 1975 due to the petitioner&#039;s significant delay of over 46 years in seeking legal recourse. The court emphasized the importance of timely legal action and found no merit in the petition, stating that there was no ground to direct the respondents to decide on the representation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 08:28:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 352 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419314</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition seeking direction for representation decision on a shop demolition that occurred in 1975 due to the petitioner&#039;s significant delay of over 46 years in seeking legal recourse. The court emphasized the importance of timely legal action and found no merit in the petition, stating that there was no ground to direct the respondents to decide on the representation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419314</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>