https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301032 An emergency arbitrator's reasoned interim order under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was treated as enforceable under Section 17(2), with the Court recording a prima facie view that the emergency arbitrator was an arbitrator, the proceedings were validly commenced, and the order was not a nullity. The Court also noted that such an order could be appealable under Section 37. Pending pronouncement of the reserved order, the Court directed maintenance of status quo to preserve the petitioner's rights and required affidavits and status reports on steps taken after 25 October 2020, leaving the remaining prayers for later consideration. en-us Tue, 02 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Mar 2022 08:27:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301032 An emergency arbitrator's reasoned interim order under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was treated as enforceable under Section 17(2), with the Court recording a prima facie view that the emergency arbitrator was an arbitrator, the proceedings were validly commenced, and the order was not a nullity. The Court also noted that such an order could be appealable under Section 37. Pending pronouncement of the reserved order, the Court directed maintenance of status quo to preserve the petitioner's rights and required affidavits and status reports on steps taken after 25 October 2020, leaving the remaining prayers for later consideration. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 02 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301032