<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1580 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301030</link>
    <description>Writ petitions were disposed of with a direction to the respondent to consider the petitioner&#039;s application under Section 84 of the Tamil Nadu VAT Act and pass a reasoned order on merits after hearing the petitioner within four weeks. The court did not decide the substantive tax dispute; it confined relief to requiring fresh consideration in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 08:27:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672359" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1580 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301030</link>
      <description>Writ petitions were disposed of with a direction to the respondent to consider the petitioner&#039;s application under Section 84 of the Tamil Nadu VAT Act and pass a reasoned order on merits after hearing the petitioner within four weeks. The court did not decide the substantive tax dispute; it confined relief to requiring fresh consideration in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301030</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>