https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301028 The Tribunal granted leave for the late filing of the reply affidavit by R-1 and directed the petitioners to file a rejoinder within three weeks. Despite objections, the Tribunal maintained the status quo by restraining R-1 from disposing of property until the application's disposal to prevent the petitioners from losing the agreed-upon amount. R-1's challenge to the execution application's maintainability was considered, but the Tribunal upheld the restraint to safeguard the petitioners' interests. Cheques were to be temporarily held by the Special Officer pending a decision on maintainability, and R-1 was directed to pay the fee due. R-2 was granted a two-week extension to file a reply affidavit. en-us Wed, 04 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Mar 2022 08:27:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301028 The Tribunal granted leave for the late filing of the reply affidavit by R-1 and directed the petitioners to file a rejoinder within three weeks. Despite objections, the Tribunal maintained the status quo by restraining R-1 from disposing of property until the application's disposal to prevent the petitioners from losing the agreed-upon amount. R-1's challenge to the execution application's maintainability was considered, but the Tribunal upheld the restraint to safeguard the petitioners' interests. Cheques were to be temporarily held by the Special Officer pending a decision on maintainability, and R-1 was directed to pay the fee due. R-2 was granted a two-week extension to file a reply affidavit. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 04 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301028