<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1893 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301026</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 1,75,00,000 under Section 68 and Rs. 3,50,000 on account of commission. The ITAT found that the assessee had provided satisfactory evidence to establish the legitimacy of the transactions, while the Assessing Officer (AO) failed to present any contradictory proof. This case underscores the significance of thorough investigation and substantiated claims by the Revenue in matters concerning unexplained cash credits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 08:27:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672355" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1893 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301026</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 1,75,00,000 under Section 68 and Rs. 3,50,000 on account of commission. The ITAT found that the assessee had provided satisfactory evidence to establish the legitimacy of the transactions, while the Assessing Officer (AO) failed to present any contradictory proof. This case underscores the significance of thorough investigation and substantiated claims by the Revenue in matters concerning unexplained cash credits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301026</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>