<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (2) TMI 5 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28237</link>
    <description>The partnership firm was entitled to registration until the death of a partner on December 7, 1969, and should be assessed as an unregistered entity thereafter. The Tribunal found that no new partnership was formed after the dissolution caused by the partner&#039;s death. The High Court upheld this decision, emphasizing the importance of the Income-tax Officer following the correct procedure in informing the firm of defects in their declaration. The Court directed the Commissioner to pay the costs of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:20:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67235" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (2) TMI 5 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28237</link>
      <description>The partnership firm was entitled to registration until the death of a partner on December 7, 1969, and should be assessed as an unregistered entity thereafter. The Tribunal found that no new partnership was formed after the dissolution caused by the partner&#039;s death. The High Court upheld this decision, emphasizing the importance of the Income-tax Officer following the correct procedure in informing the firm of defects in their declaration. The Court directed the Commissioner to pay the costs of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>