https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301021 Article 136 may be invoked by a non-complainant in exceptional public-interest situations where allegations disclose serious misconduct and the impugned order would end the prosecution at the threshold. At the charge stage, the court is limited to seeing whether the materials disclose a prima facie case; revisional jurisdiction does not permit a roving reappraisal of evidence or merits-based findings, and the charge should not be quashed on that basis. A late request to change counsel and obtain adjournment, where repeated opportunities had already been given, did not show denial of defence rights or justify transfer of the case. en-us Fri, 02 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Mar 2022 15:07:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301021 Article 136 may be invoked by a non-complainant in exceptional public-interest situations where allegations disclose serious misconduct and the impugned order would end the prosecution at the threshold. At the charge stage, the court is limited to seeing whether the materials disclose a prima facie case; revisional jurisdiction does not permit a roving reappraisal of evidence or merits-based findings, and the charge should not be quashed on that basis. A late request to change counsel and obtain adjournment, where repeated opportunities had already been given, did not show denial of defence rights or justify transfer of the case. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 02 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301021