<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 343 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419305</link>
    <description>The case involved the issue of late fee under section 200A of the Income Tax Act for delayed filing of TDS statements. The Karnataka High Court ruled that the amendments were prospective, making notices for late filing fee before 01.06.2015 invalid. In line with the Supreme Court&#039;s precedent, the Tribunal favored the assessee, deleting the late fee under section 234E and allowing the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2022 09:00:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672267" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 343 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419305</link>
      <description>The case involved the issue of late fee under section 200A of the Income Tax Act for delayed filing of TDS statements. The Karnataka High Court ruled that the amendments were prospective, making notices for late filing fee before 01.06.2015 invalid. In line with the Supreme Court&#039;s precedent, the Tribunal favored the assessee, deleting the late fee under section 234E and allowing the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419305</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>