<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 342 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419304</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee for all assessment years, directing the deletion of additions made by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A). The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of independent corroborative evidence to justify additions based on seized documents and statements, highlighting the principles of law regarding admissions and the presumption under the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2022 09:00:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672266" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 342 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419304</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee for all assessment years, directing the deletion of additions made by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A). The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of independent corroborative evidence to justify additions based on seized documents and statements, highlighting the principles of law regarding admissions and the presumption under the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419304</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>