<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 341 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419303</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the estimation of brokerage income at 2% of cash transactions, rejecting appeals from both the assessee and revenue. It emphasized the necessity of corroborative evidence for additions based on third-party documents and affirmed the validity of proceedings under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act. Appeals for other assessment years were also dismissed based on the same reasoning.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2022 09:00:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672265" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 341 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419303</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the estimation of brokerage income at 2% of cash transactions, rejecting appeals from both the assessee and revenue. It emphasized the necessity of corroborative evidence for additions based on third-party documents and affirmed the validity of proceedings under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act. Appeals for other assessment years were also dismissed based on the same reasoning.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419303</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>