<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 337 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419299</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete additions made by the A.O. for bogus purchases of rice husk and undervaluation of closing stock. The ITAT emphasized the necessity of conclusive evidence and proper inquiry by the A.O. before making such additions. The ITAT found no valid grounds to interfere with the CIT(A)&#039;s findings and dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2022 11:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672261" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 337 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419299</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete additions made by the A.O. for bogus purchases of rice husk and undervaluation of closing stock. The ITAT emphasized the necessity of conclusive evidence and proper inquiry by the A.O. before making such additions. The ITAT found no valid grounds to interfere with the CIT(A)&#039;s findings and dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419299</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>