https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419294 Allegations that the public announcement and Form G were not properly published during CIRP were rejected because the record showed publication in Mumbai newspapers and production of the original Udaipur editions containing the announcement and Form G. The Tribunal noted the distinction between e-newspaper and physical publication and recorded that no English newspaper was published in Udaipur, so the objection lacked support. It further held that repeated objections raised only when approval of the resolution plan had already been reserved for orders could not be entertained, so the application was not maintainable at that stage. en-us Thu, 24 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Mar 2022 08:59:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419294 Allegations that the public announcement and Form G were not properly published during CIRP were rejected because the record showed publication in Mumbai newspapers and production of the original Udaipur editions containing the announcement and Form G. The Tribunal noted the distinction between e-newspaper and physical publication and recorded that no English newspaper was published in Udaipur, so the objection lacked support. It further held that repeated objections raised only when approval of the resolution plan had already been reserved for orders could not be entertained, so the application was not maintainable at that stage. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Thu, 24 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419294