<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 331 - CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS COURT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419293</link>
    <description>The court found the accused&#039;s arrest to be legal and compliant with the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). It determined that the PMLA applied to the accused based on prima facie evidence. Custodial interrogation was deemed necessary for a comprehensive investigation, leading to the granting of 14 days of custody to the accused. Therefore, the accused was remanded to the custody of the Enforcement Directorate until 03.03.2022.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2022 14:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672255" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 331 - CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS COURT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419293</link>
      <description>The court found the accused&#039;s arrest to be legal and compliant with the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). It determined that the PMLA applied to the accused based on prima facie evidence. Custodial interrogation was deemed necessary for a comprehensive investigation, leading to the granting of 14 days of custody to the accused. Therefore, the accused was remanded to the custody of the Enforcement Directorate until 03.03.2022.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>