<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 323 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419285</link>
    <description>A new industrial unit located in a non-industrial area was treated as eligible for central excise exemption where its site fell within General Exemption No. 51 and Notification No. 50/2003-CE dated 10.06.2003. The notification, read with the industrial policy dated 07.01.2003, was applied to new units commencing commercial production on or after that policy date in the specified areas. The categorisation in Annexure-II was not read as limiting the non-industrial area category to existing units, and a nodal agency clarification could not override the notification. The exemption was therefore upheld, and the contrary view was found unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2022 08:59:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672247" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 323 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419285</link>
      <description>A new industrial unit located in a non-industrial area was treated as eligible for central excise exemption where its site fell within General Exemption No. 51 and Notification No. 50/2003-CE dated 10.06.2003. The notification, read with the industrial policy dated 07.01.2003, was applied to new units commencing commercial production on or after that policy date in the specified areas. The categorisation in Annexure-II was not read as limiting the non-industrial area category to existing units, and a nodal agency clarification could not override the notification. The exemption was therefore upheld, and the contrary view was found unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419285</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>