<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 319 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419281</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, ruling that Rule 9(1)(bb) did not apply to the appellant availing credit on supplementary invoices or under the reverse charge mechanism. The demand for reversal of cenvat credit was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2022 08:59:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672243" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 319 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419281</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, ruling that Rule 9(1)(bb) did not apply to the appellant availing credit on supplementary invoices or under the reverse charge mechanism. The demand for reversal of cenvat credit was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419281</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>