<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 313 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419275</link>
    <description>Sections 219 and 220 of the Code of Criminal Procedure are enabling exceptions to the general rule that distinct offences must be charged and tried separately. In prosecutions under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, dishonour of different cheques issued on different dates and supported by distinct liabilities ordinarily constitutes separate offences and separate causes of action, not one transaction. Because the two complaints arose from different factual bases and different underlying liabilities, refusal to club them disclosed no illegality, irregularity or perversity. The separate complaints were therefore permitted to proceed independently.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2022 08:58:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 313 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419275</link>
      <description>Sections 219 and 220 of the Code of Criminal Procedure are enabling exceptions to the general rule that distinct offences must be charged and tried separately. In prosecutions under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, dishonour of different cheques issued on different dates and supported by distinct liabilities ordinarily constitutes separate offences and separate causes of action, not one transaction. Because the two complaints arose from different factual bases and different underlying liabilities, refusal to club them disclosed no illegality, irregularity or perversity. The separate complaints were therefore permitted to proceed independently.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419275</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>