<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 764 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301000</link>
    <description>A person seeking to set aside a winding up order must first show statutory locus as a contributory, including proof of shareholding for the required period; absent primary evidence of that status, the application is not maintainable. A defect in newspaper publication of the winding up petition, such as omission of the petition number or cause title, is only a procedural irregularity and does not invalidate the order without demonstrated prejudice. The inherent powers under Rule 9 cannot be used to bypass the statutory appellate remedy or unsettle winding up proceedings once creditor and workmen interests have intervened.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2022 16:28:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672204" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 764 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301000</link>
      <description>A person seeking to set aside a winding up order must first show statutory locus as a contributory, including proof of shareholding for the required period; absent primary evidence of that status, the application is not maintainable. A defect in newspaper publication of the winding up petition, such as omission of the petition number or cause title, is only a procedural irregularity and does not invalidate the order without demonstrated prejudice. The inherent powers under Rule 9 cannot be used to bypass the statutory appellate remedy or unsettle winding up proceedings once creditor and workmen interests have intervened.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301000</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>