<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 1218 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300996</link>
    <description>A compromise reached at the appellate stage may justify interference with a conviction under Section 326 IPC where the settlement is voluntary, affirmed by the complainant, and not opposed by the State. The stated principle is that, in such circumstances, the appellate court may treat the compromise as serving the ends of peace between the parties and may set aside the conviction and sentence, resulting in acquittal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2022 13:13:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 1218 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300996</link>
      <description>A compromise reached at the appellate stage may justify interference with a conviction under Section 326 IPC where the settlement is voluntary, affirmed by the complainant, and not opposed by the State. The stated principle is that, in such circumstances, the appellate court may treat the compromise as serving the ends of peace between the parties and may set aside the conviction and sentence, resulting in acquittal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300996</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>