<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 283 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419245</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the withdrawal of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) proceedings, quashed lower court orders, and directed the appellant to complete the housing project within one year. Emphasizing the protection of home buyers&#039; interests and legislative intent, the court disposed of the proceedings based on the settlement. The appellant was instructed to pay costs to the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) within two weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2022 08:42:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 283 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419245</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the withdrawal of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) proceedings, quashed lower court orders, and directed the appellant to complete the housing project within one year. Emphasizing the protection of home buyers&#039; interests and legislative intent, the court disposed of the proceedings based on the settlement. The appellant was instructed to pay costs to the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) within two weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>