https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419227 Specific performance was denied where an agreement to sell a site allotted under a statutory residential scheme conflicted with the allotment conditions, including restrictions on alienation and the obligation to construct on the site; a contract that would defeat the object of the governing law was treated as unenforceable. The Court also explained that lis pendens depends on transfer by a party during pendency of litigation and is not determined by notice or good faith alone, so the subsequent transfer could not be invalidated on that basis. Although prematurity under Article 54 was discussed, the decisive point remained the underlying unenforceability of the bargain. en-us Tue, 18 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Jun 2026 13:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419227 Specific performance was denied where an agreement to sell a site allotted under a statutory residential scheme conflicted with the allotment conditions, including restrictions on alienation and the obligation to construct on the site; a contract that would defeat the object of the governing law was treated as unenforceable. The Court also explained that lis pendens depends on transfer by a party during pendency of litigation and is not determined by notice or good faith alone, so the subsequent transfer could not be invalidated on that basis. Although prematurity under Article 54 was discussed, the decisive point remained the underlying unenforceability of the bargain. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 18 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419227