<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1952 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300987</link>
    <description>Prima facie materials were assessed as supporting charges under Sections 326 and 307 IPC, because the assault involved a bottle, grievous injuries, and circumstances suggesting the act could have turned fatal without timely medical aid. The analysis also treated the accused&#039;s conduct, including alleged interference in the FIR process and the risk of witness intimidation or evidence tampering, as relevant against bail. Media attention was held irrelevant to the legal assessment, which had to rest on the prosecution material and bail principles. On that basis, the court found the investigation still ongoing and the bail request unfit for acceptance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2022 08:40:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672122" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1952 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300987</link>
      <description>Prima facie materials were assessed as supporting charges under Sections 326 and 307 IPC, because the assault involved a bottle, grievous injuries, and circumstances suggesting the act could have turned fatal without timely medical aid. The analysis also treated the accused&#039;s conduct, including alleged interference in the FIR process and the risk of witness intimidation or evidence tampering, as relevant against bail. Media attention was held irrelevant to the legal assessment, which had to rest on the prosecution material and bail principles. On that basis, the court found the investigation still ongoing and the bail request unfit for acceptance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300987</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>