https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300988 CBI investigation in another State does not require separate State consent under the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act where investigative acts form inseparable steps in a single conspiracy registered at the jurisdictional place. The High Court treated the acts in Chhattisgarh as part of the Delhi-registered conspiracy, so no separate consent was required. Article 22(2) permits exclusion of travel time when calculating the 24-hour period for production after arrest. Production before the jurisdictional Special Judge in Delhi within that period satisfied the constitutional requirement, without prior transit remand from a local Magistrate. The writ petition therefore failed. en-us Mon, 08 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Mar 2022 08:40:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300988 CBI investigation in another State does not require separate State consent under the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act where investigative acts form inseparable steps in a single conspiracy registered at the jurisdictional place. The High Court treated the acts in Chhattisgarh as part of the Delhi-registered conspiracy, so no separate consent was required. Article 22(2) permits exclusion of travel time when calculating the 24-hour period for production after arrest. Production before the jurisdictional Special Judge in Delhi within that period satisfied the constitutional requirement, without prior transit remand from a local Magistrate. The writ petition therefore failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 08 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300988