https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300988 Sections 5 and 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act were construed to permit the CBI to investigate offences in another State without obtaining separate consent for each investigative act where the case was registered in Delhi and the out-of-State acts formed part of the same conspiracy. The note also states that Article 22(2) was applied to exclude travel time while computing the 24-hour production requirement, and therefore production before the Delhi court within that period did not require prior transit remand from a local Magistrate. On those facts, the challenge to the investigation and arrest failed. en-us Mon, 08 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Mar 2022 08:40:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300988 Sections 5 and 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act were construed to permit the CBI to investigate offences in another State without obtaining separate consent for each investigative act where the case was registered in Delhi and the out-of-State acts formed part of the same conspiracy. The note also states that Article 22(2) was applied to exclude travel time while computing the 24-hour production requirement, and therefore production before the Delhi court within that period did not require prior transit remand from a local Magistrate. On those facts, the challenge to the investigation and arrest failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 08 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300988