<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1940 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300993</link>
    <description>The 2015 amendment to Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 narrows judicial scrutiny to the existence of a prima facie valid arbitration agreement, but it does not override special statutory remedies or make non-arbitrable disputes arbitrable merely because an arbitration clause exists. Section 2(3) preserves laws excluding certain disputes from arbitration, and the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 continues to confer an additional beneficial remedy. Consumer disputes were therefore treated as remaining outside compulsory reference to arbitration, and consumer fora may proceed despite an arbitration agreement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2025 15:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1940 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300993</link>
      <description>The 2015 amendment to Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 narrows judicial scrutiny to the existence of a prima facie valid arbitration agreement, but it does not override special statutory remedies or make non-arbitrable disputes arbitrable merely because an arbitration clause exists. Section 2(3) preserves laws excluding certain disputes from arbitration, and the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 continues to confer an additional beneficial remedy. Consumer disputes were therefore treated as remaining outside compulsory reference to arbitration, and consumer fora may proceed despite an arbitration agreement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300993</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>