<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 667 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300981</link>
    <description>Inordinate delay in criminal proceedings, where not attributable to the accused, may justify reduction of sentence as a mitigating circumstance under Article 21&#039;s right to speedy justice, including at the appellate stage. The prosecution evidence proving the occurrence and the appellants&#039; responsibility for the fatal brickbat blows was accepted, and the conviction was sustained. However, because the incident was about 12 years old, the appellants had already undergone more than 13 months&#039; imprisonment, and no dilatory conduct was attributable to them, the sentence was reduced to the period already undergone.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2022 18:42:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 667 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300981</link>
      <description>Inordinate delay in criminal proceedings, where not attributable to the accused, may justify reduction of sentence as a mitigating circumstance under Article 21&#039;s right to speedy justice, including at the appellate stage. The prosecution evidence proving the occurrence and the appellants&#039; responsibility for the fatal brickbat blows was accepted, and the conviction was sustained. However, because the incident was about 12 years old, the appellants had already undergone more than 13 months&#039; imprisonment, and no dilatory conduct was attributable to them, the sentence was reduced to the period already undergone.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300981</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>