<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 742 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300978</link>
    <description>Criminal proceedings under Section 498A IPC were quashed after the parties settled their dispute and the complainant stated that she did not wish to prosecute. The Court held that, in the peculiar facts, further continuation of the prosecution would be unnecessary and oppressive and amounted to an abuse of process. Exercising its constitutional power to do complete justice under Article 142, the Court quashed the FIR and related proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2022 17:47:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 742 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300978</link>
      <description>Criminal proceedings under Section 498A IPC were quashed after the parties settled their dispute and the complainant stated that she did not wish to prosecute. The Court held that, in the peculiar facts, further continuation of the prosecution would be unnecessary and oppressive and amounted to an abuse of process. Exercising its constitutional power to do complete justice under Article 142, the Court quashed the FIR and related proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>