<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (5) TMI 45 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300977</link>
    <description>A retrenchment dispute was treated as an industrial dispute because it had been espoused by a body of workmen; a registered union was not required, and an unregistered association could validly sponsor the workmen&#039;s cause. The challenge also failed because no plea was raised before the tribunal that the dispute was not an industrial dispute. On the separate contention that the &quot;first come last go&quot; principle should apply, the Court held that the argument depended on a factual issue not raised before the tribunal or HC and could not be introduced for the first time in the Supreme Court. The award and orders below were left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2022 15:39:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672100" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (5) TMI 45 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300977</link>
      <description>A retrenchment dispute was treated as an industrial dispute because it had been espoused by a body of workmen; a registered union was not required, and an unregistered association could validly sponsor the workmen&#039;s cause. The challenge also failed because no plea was raised before the tribunal that the dispute was not an industrial dispute. On the separate contention that the &quot;first come last go&quot; principle should apply, the Court held that the argument depended on a factual issue not raised before the tribunal or HC and could not be introduced for the first time in the Supreme Court. The award and orders below were left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>