<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (10) TMI 189 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300974</link>
    <description>A voluntary collective settlement signed by a union is binding on its members under Section 18(1) when the union is a party to it, and signed declarations of membership will be treated as presumptive proof absent contrary evidence. The settlement here was found free from duress, coercion, or false promises, so the workmen who signed and other union members were bound. A negotiated settlement reached by a large majority of workmen must be assessed as a whole for fairness, not compared item by item with a tribunal&#039;s adjudicatory award. On that basis, the settlement was treated as just and fair and as controlling the dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2022 15:32:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672099" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (10) TMI 189 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300974</link>
      <description>A voluntary collective settlement signed by a union is binding on its members under Section 18(1) when the union is a party to it, and signed declarations of membership will be treated as presumptive proof absent contrary evidence. The settlement here was found free from duress, coercion, or false promises, so the workmen who signed and other union members were bound. A negotiated settlement reached by a large majority of workmen must be assessed as a whole for fairness, not compared item by item with a tribunal&#039;s adjudicatory award. On that basis, the settlement was treated as just and fair and as controlling the dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300974</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>