https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300971 Bail under Section 439 CrPC was considered by reference to the nature of the accusation, the stage of investigation, the accused's availability for trial, and the risk of tampering with evidence. On the facts, the applicant's claimed absence from Delhi at the relevant time and the limited material linking him to the theatre weighed in favour of release. The apprehension of interference with prosecution evidence was treated as manageable through bail conditions. The petitioner was therefore found entitled to bail, without any expression on the merits of the case. en-us Fri, 01 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Mar 2022 14:34:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300971 Bail under Section 439 CrPC was considered by reference to the nature of the accusation, the stage of investigation, the accused's availability for trial, and the risk of tampering with evidence. On the facts, the applicant's claimed absence from Delhi at the relevant time and the limited material linking him to the theatre weighed in favour of release. The apprehension of interference with prosecution evidence was treated as manageable through bail conditions. The petitioner was therefore found entitled to bail, without any expression on the merits of the case. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 01 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300971