https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419226 HC directed a fresh hearing for a contractor challenging a service tax demand of Rs. 1,46,41,544 for alleged willful suppression of facts. The petitioner claimed all taxes were paid with certain exemptions under law changes. The court refrained from evaluating tax payments under Article 226 without complete evidence. The Joint Commissioner was ordered to conduct a fresh hearing where the petitioner must present all relevant materials. No coercive action permitted against the petitioner pending the reasoned order from this hearing. en-us Wed, 02 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Apr 2025 18:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419226 HC directed a fresh hearing for a contractor challenging a service tax demand of Rs. 1,46,41,544 for alleged willful suppression of facts. The petitioner claimed all taxes were paid with certain exemptions under law changes. The court refrained from evaluating tax payments under Article 226 without complete evidence. The Joint Commissioner was ordered to conduct a fresh hearing where the petitioner must present all relevant materials. No coercive action permitted against the petitioner pending the reasoned order from this hearing. Case-Laws GST Wed, 02 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419226