<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 233 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419195</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court found in favor of the petitioner, acknowledging the High Court&#039;s failure to address mandatory requirements and granting leniency to the respondent(s) on improper grounds. Despite the respondent(s) being cooperative senior citizens, the Court chose not to intervene, leaving the legal issue unresolved. The decision will not serve as a precedent for future cases, and the special leave petitions and pending applications were all resolved accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2022 07:58:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 233 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419195</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court found in favor of the petitioner, acknowledging the High Court&#039;s failure to address mandatory requirements and granting leniency to the respondent(s) on improper grounds. Despite the respondent(s) being cooperative senior citizens, the Court chose not to intervene, leaving the legal issue unresolved. The decision will not serve as a precedent for future cases, and the special leave petitions and pending applications were all resolved accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419195</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>