https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419186 Natural justice was not breached where a revised notice proposing escaped turnover on a different basis required a fresh response, and the assessee was repeatedly given opportunities to object and seek a hearing. In the absence of objections or appearance despite several adjournments, the earlier reply could not be relied on to invalidate the assessment. The HC held that non-consideration of the earlier reply did not vitiate the assessment proceedings under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, and no interference under Article 226 was warranted. en-us Tue, 25 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Mar 2022 07:57:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419186 Natural justice was not breached where a revised notice proposing escaped turnover on a different basis required a fresh response, and the assessee was repeatedly given opportunities to object and seek a hearing. In the absence of objections or appearance despite several adjournments, the earlier reply could not be relied on to invalidate the assessment. The HC held that non-consideration of the earlier reply did not vitiate the assessment proceedings under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, and no interference under Article 226 was warranted. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 25 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419186