https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300957 The court issued a Notice returnable on 14th June 2017, prohibiting coercive action based on the impugned order-in-original. Direct service was permitted concerning respondent No.2. The judgment revolves around challenging the impugned order-in-original, including the validity of the show cause notice and reliance on previous orders by the Commissioner (Appeals). The court's decision acknowledges the petitioners' contentions regarding favorable earlier orders and the alleged invalidity of the show cause notice, emphasizing procedural compliance and the impact of past decisions on current adjudications. en-us Thu, 04 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Mar 2022 07:56:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300957 The court issued a Notice returnable on 14th June 2017, prohibiting coercive action based on the impugned order-in-original. Direct service was permitted concerning respondent No.2. The judgment revolves around challenging the impugned order-in-original, including the validity of the show cause notice and reliance on previous orders by the Commissioner (Appeals). The court's decision acknowledges the petitioners' contentions regarding favorable earlier orders and the alleged invalidity of the show cause notice, emphasizing procedural compliance and the impact of past decisions on current adjudications. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 04 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300957