<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 1335 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300965</link>
    <description>A writ petition filed at the notice stage led the Madras High Court to direct the second respondent to grant the petitioner a personal hearing and then pass orders in accordance with law. The Court did not examine the merits of the dispute and expressly left all contentions open for consideration by the authority. The practical effect is a remand for fresh decision after hearing the petitioner, with no adjudication on the underlying issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2022 07:56:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672007" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 1335 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300965</link>
      <description>A writ petition filed at the notice stage led the Madras High Court to direct the second respondent to grant the petitioner a personal hearing and then pass orders in accordance with law. The Court did not examine the merits of the dispute and expressly left all contentions open for consideration by the authority. The practical effect is a remand for fresh decision after hearing the petitioner, with no adjudication on the underlying issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>