<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 211 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419173</link>
    <description>Revisional jurisdiction under section 263 cannot be used merely because the revisional authority prefers a deeper or different enquiry where the Assessing Officer has already made enquiry, applied his mind and adopted a plausible view on the material. Here, the assessment records showed that cash deposits were specifically examined, the bank account details were called for, and the assessee&#039;s explanation that the deposits came from sale consideration of agricultural land was considered and accepted as satisfactory. As adequate enquiry had been made and a possible view taken, the revisional order setting aside the assessment for inadequate enquiry was unsustainable and was set aside; the assessment was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2022 08:58:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 211 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419173</link>
      <description>Revisional jurisdiction under section 263 cannot be used merely because the revisional authority prefers a deeper or different enquiry where the Assessing Officer has already made enquiry, applied his mind and adopted a plausible view on the material. Here, the assessment records showed that cash deposits were specifically examined, the bank account details were called for, and the assessee&#039;s explanation that the deposits came from sale consideration of agricultural land was considered and accepted as satisfactory. As adequate enquiry had been made and a possible view taken, the revisional order setting aside the assessment for inadequate enquiry was unsustainable and was set aside; the assessment was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>