<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 200 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419162</link>
    <description>The Central Bank of India appealed the dismissal of Company Applications seeking settlement in the liquidation of M/s.Mettur Textiles Industries Ltd. Disputes over interest rates led to multiple tribunals&#039; involvement, resulting in varying payment directions. The Bank prioritized its claim due to the first charge on assets. Various orders directed the Official Liquidator to settle claims, including payments to ICICI Bank and IOB. The Bank received dividends and interest payments as per court orders. Re-adjudication of workers&#039; claims and notice to contributories ensured fair settlement. The Bank&#039;s financial position and additional dividend payments were detailed in court reports, leading to the appeal&#039;s dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2022 08:57:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671931" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 200 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419162</link>
      <description>The Central Bank of India appealed the dismissal of Company Applications seeking settlement in the liquidation of M/s.Mettur Textiles Industries Ltd. Disputes over interest rates led to multiple tribunals&#039; involvement, resulting in varying payment directions. The Bank prioritized its claim due to the first charge on assets. Various orders directed the Official Liquidator to settle claims, including payments to ICICI Bank and IOB. The Bank received dividends and interest payments as per court orders. Re-adjudication of workers&#039; claims and notice to contributories ensured fair settlement. The Bank&#039;s financial position and additional dividend payments were detailed in court reports, leading to the appeal&#039;s dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>