<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 189 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419151</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, M/s Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd., in a case concerning the eligibility to avail CENVAT credit distributed by Input Service Distributors. The adjudicating authority failed to consider the appellant&#039;s replies and provide detailed reasoning, leading to the matter being remitted for a fresh reasoned order. The impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed, granting the appellant the opportunity to submit fresh submissions within six weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2022 08:57:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671914" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 189 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419151</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, M/s Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd., in a case concerning the eligibility to avail CENVAT credit distributed by Input Service Distributors. The adjudicating authority failed to consider the appellant&#039;s replies and provide detailed reasoning, leading to the matter being remitted for a fresh reasoned order. The impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed, granting the appellant the opportunity to submit fresh submissions within six weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419151</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>