<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 186 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419148</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the rejection of the claim for refund of the accumulated CENVAT credit balance of the manufacturer of motor vehicle parts. The decision was based on the interpretation of relevant legal provisions, precedents, and the legislative intent behind the CENVAT credit scheme, ultimately upholding the Revenue&#039;s stance on the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2022 14:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671911" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 186 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419148</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the rejection of the claim for refund of the accumulated CENVAT credit balance of the manufacturer of motor vehicle parts. The decision was based on the interpretation of relevant legal provisions, precedents, and the legislative intent behind the CENVAT credit scheme, ultimately upholding the Revenue&#039;s stance on the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>