<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 178 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419140</link>
    <description>The High Court directed that the jurisdictional issue raised by the petitioner regarding notices issued under the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2017-18 should be decided first by the Income Tax Officer. If unfavorable, the petitioner was granted 15 days to seek legal remedies. The court disposed of the writ petition and pending applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2022 08:55:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671901" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 178 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419140</link>
      <description>The High Court directed that the jurisdictional issue raised by the petitioner regarding notices issued under the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2017-18 should be decided first by the Income Tax Officer. If unfavorable, the petitioner was granted 15 days to seek legal remedies. The court disposed of the writ petition and pending applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419140</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>