<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 172 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419134</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the assessment due to the mechanical approval given by the Principal Commissioner under Section 151 of the Income Tax Act, leading to the invalid assumption of jurisdiction. Consequently, the appeal by the assessee was allowed, and the assessment framed by the AO under Sections 143(3)/147 was set aside. Other issues regarding the validity of jurisdiction and the merits of additions were not addressed as the primary issue was decided in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2022 08:55:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671895" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 172 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419134</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the assessment due to the mechanical approval given by the Principal Commissioner under Section 151 of the Income Tax Act, leading to the invalid assumption of jurisdiction. Consequently, the appeal by the assessee was allowed, and the assessment framed by the AO under Sections 143(3)/147 was set aside. Other issues regarding the validity of jurisdiction and the merits of additions were not addressed as the primary issue was decided in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>