<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1798 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300923</link>
    <description>The appeal against the order of liquidation under the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code was dismissed by the Tribunal. The Appellant, claiming to be a &#039;Resolution Applicant&#039;, sought exclusion of days for counting the period of 270 days. However, the Tribunal held that the right to file such applications for exclusion of time lies with the &#039;Committee of Creditors&#039; or &#039;Resolution Professional&#039;. As none of the &#039;Resolution Plans&#039; were deemed viable and feasible, the liquidation order was upheld, with directions for the Liquidator to adhere to legal provisions and previous judgments for future actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2022 08:55:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671889" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1798 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300923</link>
      <description>The appeal against the order of liquidation under the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code was dismissed by the Tribunal. The Appellant, claiming to be a &#039;Resolution Applicant&#039;, sought exclusion of days for counting the period of 270 days. However, the Tribunal held that the right to file such applications for exclusion of time lies with the &#039;Committee of Creditors&#039; or &#039;Resolution Professional&#039;. As none of the &#039;Resolution Plans&#039; were deemed viable and feasible, the liquidation order was upheld, with directions for the Liquidator to adhere to legal provisions and previous judgments for future actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300923</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>