https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300929 The court dismissed the suit as there was no subrogation of insurance policy rights to the plaintiff, the one-time settlement (OTS) was comprehensive, and the plaintiff was not entitled to the claimed amount with interest. The court found no binding agreement for the defendant to prosecute the suit against the insurance company on behalf of the plaintiff. Consequently, the suit was dismissed with no order as to costs. en-us Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Mar 2022 08:55:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300929 The court dismissed the suit as there was no subrogation of insurance policy rights to the plaintiff, the one-time settlement (OTS) was comprehensive, and the plaintiff was not entitled to the claimed amount with interest. The court found no binding agreement for the defendant to prosecute the suit against the insurance company on behalf of the plaintiff. Consequently, the suit was dismissed with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300929