<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 1301 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300928</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the Assessee, deleting the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The penalty was deemed unjustified as the assessment order, forming its basis, had been set aside in a previous case. Following the precedent that without valid additions in the assessment order, no penalty for concealment can be levied, the ITAT upheld the appeal and annulled the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2022 08:55:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 1301 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300928</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the Assessee, deleting the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The penalty was deemed unjustified as the assessment order, forming its basis, had been set aside in a previous case. Following the precedent that without valid additions in the assessment order, no penalty for concealment can be levied, the ITAT upheld the appeal and annulled the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300928</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>