<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 668 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT  </title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300918</link>
    <description>A pending show cause notice was ordered to remain in abeyance until the Tribunal decided an identical issue in the connected matter. After that decision, the authorities were required to grant the petitioner a reasonable opportunity of hearing and then pass the adjudication order in accordance with law. The operative effect was to defer adjudication pending resolution of the parallel dispute, while preserving the petitioner&#039;s right to be heard before final determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2022 17:14:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671865" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 668 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT  </title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300918</link>
      <description>A pending show cause notice was ordered to remain in abeyance until the Tribunal decided an identical issue in the connected matter. After that decision, the authorities were required to grant the petitioner a reasonable opportunity of hearing and then pass the adjudication order in accordance with law. The operative effect was to defer adjudication pending resolution of the parallel dispute, while preserving the petitioner&#039;s right to be heard before final determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300918</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>