<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (2) TMI 136 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300917</link>
    <description>Damages for breach of contract were confined to loss that naturally arose in the usual course of things or was within the parties&#039; contemplation at the time of contracting under Section 73 of the Indian Contract Act. Where the buyer did not disclose that the scrap iron was intended for export, later notice of that purpose did not enlarge the seller&#039;s liability. The claimed loss from a separate onward resale arrangement was treated as remote and indirect, and Illustration (k) to Section 73 was applied to exclude recovery of that export-related loss.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2022 14:22:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (2) TMI 136 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300917</link>
      <description>Damages for breach of contract were confined to loss that naturally arose in the usual course of things or was within the parties&#039; contemplation at the time of contracting under Section 73 of the Indian Contract Act. Where the buyer did not disclose that the scrap iron was intended for export, later notice of that purpose did not enlarge the seller&#039;s liability. The claimed loss from a separate onward resale arrangement was treated as remote and indirect, and Illustration (k) to Section 73 was applied to exclude recovery of that export-related loss.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>