<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1604 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300913</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(Appeals) decisions regarding the disallowance of lease equalization charges and professional charges. The Tribunal found both claims legitimate and justified, citing previous Tribunal decisions in favor of the assessee and directing the Assessing Officer to allow the expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2022 13:05:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671855" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1604 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300913</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(Appeals) decisions regarding the disallowance of lease equalization charges and professional charges. The Tribunal found both claims legitimate and justified, citing previous Tribunal decisions in favor of the assessee and directing the Assessing Officer to allow the expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>