<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 146 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419108</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the delay in filing was condoned due to sufficient cause. Regarding the disallowance of repair expenses under section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, the Tribunal found in favor of the assessee, accepting that the expenses were incurred by the driver as an agent, exempt under Rule 6DD(k) of the IT Rules. The Tribunal set aside the previous orders, directing the removal of the disallowance of &amp;amp;8377; 69,500.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2022 16:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671796" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 146 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419108</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the delay in filing was condoned due to sufficient cause. Regarding the disallowance of repair expenses under section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, the Tribunal found in favor of the assessee, accepting that the expenses were incurred by the driver as an agent, exempt under Rule 6DD(k) of the IT Rules. The Tribunal set aside the previous orders, directing the removal of the disallowance of &amp;amp;8377; 69,500.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419108</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>