<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 144 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419106</link>
    <description>The Tribunal considered a delay in filing the appeal due to pandemic circumstances, condoned the delay, and proceeded to hear the case on merits. The issues revolved around the disallowance of contributions towards PF &amp;amp; ESI, deposited before the due date, under Section 36(1)(va) of the Act. The Tribunal determined that the Finance Act 2021 amendment was prospective, effective from April 1, 2021. Consequently, the disallowances by the Assessing Officer were overturned, and the assesses&#039; appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2022 06:50:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 144 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419106</link>
      <description>The Tribunal considered a delay in filing the appeal due to pandemic circumstances, condoned the delay, and proceeded to hear the case on merits. The issues revolved around the disallowance of contributions towards PF &amp;amp; ESI, deposited before the due date, under Section 36(1)(va) of the Act. The Tribunal determined that the Finance Act 2021 amendment was prospective, effective from April 1, 2021. Consequently, the disallowances by the Assessing Officer were overturned, and the assesses&#039; appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419106</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>