<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (12) TMI 9 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28179</link>
    <description>The court held that the sum received by the assessee upon retirement from a partnership firm, representing his share of accumulated losses, should be taxed as long-term capital gains and not as business income. It clarified that the amount was payment for relinquishing his interest in the firm, including his share of goodwill. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act did not apply in this case, and the assessee was entitled to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:13:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (12) TMI 9 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28179</link>
      <description>The court held that the sum received by the assessee upon retirement from a partnership firm, representing his share of accumulated losses, should be taxed as long-term capital gains and not as business income. It clarified that the amount was payment for relinquishing his interest in the firm, including his share of goodwill. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act did not apply in this case, and the assessee was entitled to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28179</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>