https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419081 Delhi courts lacked territorial jurisdiction over an LLP partner dispute concerning access to business accounts because the pleadings did not show that the accounts or books were kept in Delhi, the LLP's registered office was in Hyderabad, and no concrete cause of action was pleaded in Delhi. A jurisdiction clause could not confer territorial jurisdiction where none otherwise existed. The dispute was also not exclusively triable by the NCLT, as it concerned inter se partner rights and did not fall within the LLP Act provisions on compromise, arrangement, reconstruction, winding up or dissolution. In the absence of an express statutory bar, civil court jurisdiction under Section 9 CPC remained available. en-us Fri, 25 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Mar 2022 10:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419081 Delhi courts lacked territorial jurisdiction over an LLP partner dispute concerning access to business accounts because the pleadings did not show that the accounts or books were kept in Delhi, the LLP's registered office was in Hyderabad, and no concrete cause of action was pleaded in Delhi. A jurisdiction clause could not confer territorial jurisdiction where none otherwise existed. The dispute was also not exclusively triable by the NCLT, as it concerned inter se partner rights and did not fall within the LLP Act provisions on compromise, arrangement, reconstruction, winding up or dissolution. In the absence of an express statutory bar, civil court jurisdiction under Section 9 CPC remained available. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 25 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419081