<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 118 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419080</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed as the appellant, Registrar of Companies, Kerala, was deemed not the proper authority to file it. The Court held that the Central Government, specifically the SFIO, was the aggrieved party authorized to initiate investigations under the Companies Act, 2013. The dismissal does not prevent the Central Government from challenging the order before a competent forum if desired.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2022 06:49:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 118 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419080</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed as the appellant, Registrar of Companies, Kerala, was deemed not the proper authority to file it. The Court held that the Central Government, specifically the SFIO, was the aggrieved party authorized to initiate investigations under the Companies Act, 2013. The dismissal does not prevent the Central Government from challenging the order before a competent forum if desired.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419080</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>